[markdown] commonMark #2957

Closed
opened 2014-12-01 10:43:49 +01:00 by marijnh · 1 comment
marijnh commented 2014-12-01 10:43:49 +01:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

is the markdown implementation tested with the commonMark tests?

So does it, or are you planning to conform to the commonMark specs? http://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/ Since it is "mostly" fixes for inconsistent or undefined behavior it would be really awesome.

is the markdown implementation tested with the commonMark tests? So does it, or are you planning to conform to the commonMark specs? http://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/ Since it is "mostly" fixes for inconsistent or undefined behavior it would be really awesome.
marijnh commented 2014-12-01 17:58:02 +01:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

This is not something that anyone is working on. Since highlighting modes have less freedom than a full parser (no lookahead, for one thing), I doubt the CodeMirror mode will ever be 'fullly conformant'. If you run into specific corner cases that you'd like improved, submit individual issues. I'm closing this as being out of scope.

This is not something that anyone is working on. Since highlighting modes have less freedom than a full parser (no lookahead, for one thing), I doubt the CodeMirror mode will ever be 'fullly conformant'. If you run into specific corner cases that you'd like improved, submit individual issues. I'm closing this as being out of scope.
marijnh (Migrated from gitlab.com) closed this issue 2014-12-01 17:58:02 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
codemirror/codemirror5#2957
No description provided.